Flink’s complexity stems from supporting a variety of use cases and having a rich set of features, but can be simplified with proper tooling. By Yaroslav Tkachenk.
The article covers these topics:
- Flink’s complexity comes primarily from supporting many different use cases (analytics, integration, ETL) and having a large feature set that enables these capabilities.
- The complexity is manageable with proper tools like the Flink Kubernetes Operator which simplifies deployment and management.
- Focusing on specific workflows can minimize Flink’s complexity by not using all its features at once.
- While Flink requires more effort upfront to learn and deploy compared to proprietary solutions, its richness of capabilities far surpasses any one-size fits all tool.
- The claims that Flink is “complex” are overblown considering other tools also have complexity, especially when supporting a wide range of use cases.
Flink is not going anywhere due to its rich feature set and support for a wide range of data streaming use cases, but requires proper tools like the Kubernetes Operator and focused workflows to minimize complexity compared to proprietary solutions. While the claims that Flink is "complex" are overblown considering other tools also have their own complexities, its richness far surpasses any one-size fits all tool for data processing. Nice one!
[Read More]